Skip to content

fix convolution function#475

Merged
sbfnk merged 3 commits intomainfrom
fix-convolution
Jun 21, 2025
Merged

fix convolution function#475
sbfnk merged 3 commits intomainfrom
fix-convolution

Conversation

@sbfnk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sbfnk sbfnk commented Jun 20, 2025

Looking again I think that indeed the indexing was going wrong.

Closes #300.

Unfortunately this means once again re-generating the data. Doing it now so don't merge yet please.

Comment thread R/convolve-with-delay.r
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@seabbs seabbs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not ideal and agree with the fix. Am I correct in thinking this should only have impacted the early parts of the time series?

@sbfnk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sbfnk commented Jun 20, 2025

That matches my understanding, yes

@sbfnk sbfnk enabled auto-merge June 21, 2025 07:07
@sbfnk sbfnk added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5850cc4 Jun 21, 2025
8 checks passed
@sbfnk sbfnk deleted the fix-convolution branch June 21, 2025 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

convolve_with_delay seems to have indexing wrong

2 participants